In article <43444e7e.6990859@news.actrix.co.nz>,
slaybot@hotmail.com (--Newsman--) wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Oct 2005 10:02:45 +1300, Kerry
> wrote:
>
> >In article <43443b2b.2043859@news.actrix.co.nz>,
> > slaybot@hotmail.com (--Newsman--) wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> He would be working in a higher value economy with a vastly greater
> >> range of opportunities. Because of these two factors his prospects are
> >> immeasurably greater than in New Zealand.
> >>
> >> One thing he *will* certainly notice, and which will help to broaden
> >> his outlook, is that he'll feel more - and better - connected with the
> >> rest of the world.
> >
> >That may be the case
> >
> >However he will only be financially better off if he absconds and
> >neglects to pay back his Nz debts while he does so.
> >
> If he has any maturity at all, he'll be aware that at his age his
> relative financial position vis a vis the two countries is only a
> short term consideration.
>
> Longer term, it's invariably the wider world for the broad-thinking,
> the ambitious and the forward-looking.
So what was the appeal of this country for you? And now that you are
'free', why do you stay?
--
Just because something is beyond your comprehension doesn't mean
it is scientific. |