National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




> Subject to subclause(2), the applicant has been employed in a skilled Posted on: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:24:39 +0000


> Please read in conjuction with my previous thread located at:
>
> http://britishexpats.com/forum/showthread.php?t=339611
>
> This is an email containing a letter i recieved today. it says
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
> "Our office conducted checks against Mr Nadir's claim for work
> experience as an Employee with the "my company name"
> • Mr Nadir submitted a Letter of Experience Certificate dated
> 13/11/2004
> signed by xyz Human Resources Manager – "My company's name".
> • Office investigations established that the "my company" does not
> have its own Human Resource Manager and the signatory (xyz) was not
> known by "my company"
> I am currently not satisified that Mr Nadir meets regulation 136.213
> which states:
> Subject to subclause(2), the applicant has been employed in a skilled
> occupation:
> (a) if 60 points are specified by Gazette Notice as available for the
> skilled
> occupation nominated in the application — for a period of, or
> for periods
> totalling, at least 12 months in the period of 18 months
> immediately before
> the day on which the application was made; or
> (b) if 40 or 50 points are specified by Gazette Notice as available
> for the
> skilled occupation nominated in the application — for a period
> of, or for
> periods totalling, at least 24 months in the period of 36 months
> immediately
> before the day on which the application was made.
>
> In accordance with departmental policy, the applicant is hereby given
> the opportunity to comment
> on these findings and/or provide any further verifiable evidence in
> support of the applicant’s claims.
> Please note that all copies of any supporting documents must be
> attested/certified by an appropriate
> person as being true copies of the originals.
>
> Timeframe for Response
> A full response should be made within 28 days of receiving this
> letter, which is by – 24 December
> 2005.
> You are taken to have received this letter today.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------
>
> Now please tell me people do i need to send them a clarification again
> whereas i have already done so just last saturday?
> Was it a mistake of mine that i didnt inform DIMIA about merging of HR
> Department with Admin department? I thought that just for change of
> personal circumstances you need to send a 1022 which i did when i got
> a new passport ?
> What should be my course of action ?
>
> Please help me in passing through this testing time
> Nadir

Hi Nadir

Looks like your letters (mentioned in previous thread) have crossed
with this request from DIMIA. I would follow-up with an Email to
the case officer advising that you have already sent letters
explaining the situation and can the yconfirm receipt - also state
that this is an obvious error and that if they are still not
satisfied, could they please get the overseas post to re-check the
information with the employer.

Tony

--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com