You applied 2 years ago and now your file needed to be updated with
information not included in the original application but necessary to
conclude background/security check. Patience is the virtue... - your case is
still on track.
--
../..
Andrew Miller
Immigration Consultant
Vancouver, British Columbia
email: AndrewMillerREMOVE@REMOVEcanada.com
(delete REMOVE from the above address before sending email)
________________________________
"dll2002dll" wrote in message
news:2e67b553.0311272033.775f70a@posting.google.com...
> My Details:
>
> Student since Sep 2001.
> doing Co-Op: Sep 2003 - Jan 2004
>
> Still full time student in post graduate university, doing co-op.
>
> My Immigration application details:
>
> Applied: 04th Dec 2001
> AOR: 25th Jan 2002
> Interview waiver/Medical Form/RCMP Finger Prints: 23rd Jan 2003
> (Wait 6 months for medical)
> RCMP Finger Prints sent: End January 2003
> RCMP Finger Prints Sent again due to poor quality of previous prints:
> March 2003
> Medicals done: 15 July 2003
> Letter Requiring Background Declaration: 26th Sep 2003
>
> The letter was from the Immigration officer it self, he states in the
> letter that he has stopped all the processing of my case, because I
> have provided insufficient information to him, he further states that
> I have to provide information that what I was doing in Canada for the
> last two years.
>
> I sent the letter back on 30th Sep 2003 with the written
> explanation/essay that what I was doing for the last two years in
> canada like life/studies/work!
>
> Now I am still waiting for futher reply, may be I am getting
> impatient! The e-client application status only says In process.
>
> All I wanna to know what is this last letter all about, what I am
> doing for the last 2 years in Canada...............?
>
> What and when should I expect a response?
> How long should I wait?
> In what stage I should think my case is in?
> Is there any advantage to order CAIPs file now for me or not?
>
> Any response would be highly appreciated from well known immigration
> consultants, who are regular in this news group.
>
> Thanks.
|