I believe most of applicants got similar letters asking further personal
history after the date application was submitted. This is new, reasons?
their slow process (so they need updated information) or new investigation
requirement? As a lot of people got it, I think it is a normal procedure
nowadays. In my CAIPS note, it said this information is needed for PHA, I
gather it is for pesonal history assessment, anyone can confirm?
"dll2002dll" wrote in message
news:2e67b553.0311272033.775f70a@posting.google.com...
> My Details:
>
> Student since Sep 2001.
> doing Co-Op: Sep 2003 - Jan 2004
>
> Still full time student in post graduate university, doing co-op.
>
> My Immigration application details:
>
> Applied: 04th Dec 2001
> AOR: 25th Jan 2002
> Interview waiver/Medical Form/RCMP Finger Prints: 23rd Jan 2003
> (Wait 6 months for medical)
> RCMP Finger Prints sent: End January 2003
> RCMP Finger Prints Sent again due to poor quality of previous prints:
> March 2003
> Medicals done: 15 July 2003
> Letter Requiring Background Declaration: 26th Sep 2003
>
> The letter was from the Immigration officer it self, he states in the
> letter that he has stopped all the processing of my case, because I
> have provided insufficient information to him, he further states that
> I have to provide information that what I was doing in Canada for the
> last two years.
>
> I sent the letter back on 30th Sep 2003 with the written
> explanation/essay that what I was doing for the last two years in
> canada like life/studies/work!
>
> Now I am still waiting for futher reply, may be I am getting
> impatient! The e-client application status only says In process.
>
> All I wanna to know what is this last letter all about, what I am
> doing for the last 2 years in Canada...............?
>
> What and when should I expect a response?
> How long should I wait?
> In what stage I should think my case is in?
> Is there any advantage to order CAIPs file now for me or not?
>
> Any response would be highly appreciated from well known immigration
> consultants, who are regular in this news group.
>
> Thanks.
|