National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: All about ...! Posted on: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:35:35 EST

Sarnia Chronicles wrote:
> Sarnia Chronicles wrote:
>> Sarnia Chronicles wrote:
>>> I don't like .! I don't like .! I don't like .!
>>>
>>> Extra! Extra! Extra!
>>>
>>> I don't like .! I don't like .! I don't like .!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Now there's people that don't know what I mean when I say I don't
>>> like .. So I'm going to tell you what it means. It means:
>>>
>>> 1) I don't want to have ..
>>> 2) I won't have ..
>>> 3) I didn't have ..
>>> 4) I'm not jealous of people having ..
>>> 5) I'm not seeking ..
>>> 6) I don't feel left out of the ". scene".
>>>
>>> Let's look at a couple of scenarios involving .. These scenarios
>>> will illustrate how not liking . will impact me:
>>>
>>> Scenario #1:
>>>
>>> A girl doesn't want to have . with me. In this scenario no .
>>> will occur because I don't want to have . with the girl *and* the
>>> girl doesn't want to have . with me. There is absolutely no
>>> impact on me; it's business as usual.
>>>
>>> Scenario #2:
>>>
>>> A girl wants to have . with me. In this scenario no . will
>>> occur because I don't want to have . with the girl. There is
>>> absolutely no impact on me; it's business as usual.
>>>
>>> Scenario #3:
>>>
>>> A girl wants to have . with another dude. In this scenario .
>>> may occur between the girl and the other dude (unless the other dude
>>> doesn't want to . her either. lol) *BUT* no . will occur
>>> between me and the girl. There is absolutely no impact on me; it's
>>> business as usual.
>>>
>>>
>>> In the first scenario neither the girl or I want to sleep with each
>>> other and I couldn't be happier.
>>>
>>> In the second scenario the girl wants to have . with me and I
>>> couldn't care less. I don't like . and any girl that wants to
>>> have . with me is shit out of luck.
>>>
>>> In the third scenario the girl may be .ing some other dude and I
>>> couldn't give a rat's ass. Better him than me... And I'm happy for
>>> both of them for getting what they want. :-D
>>>
>>> There is no way in hell I will ever have . with a girl! I don't
>>> like .. I don't want .. And I applaud and salute any male that
>>> does want to have . with a girl -- cuz I do *NOT* want to have .
>>> with the bitch.
>>>
>>>
>>> The bottom line:
>>>
>>> NO . WILL OCCUR BETWEEN ME AND ANY FEMALE AND IT DOES NOT MATTER
>>> WHETHER THE GIRL WANTS TO OR NOT! THE BOTTOM LINE IS THAT I DON"T
>>> WANT TO HAVE . AND I'M NOT GOING TO HAVE .! EXCLAMATION MARK!
>>
>>
>> So people will ask the dumbest questions when they're confronted with
>> this information. They will ask:
>>
>> 1) Why don't you like .?
>>
>> *AND*
>>
>> 2) Why don't you want a girl?
>>
>> And those are the wrong questions!
>>
>> The correct questions are:
>>
>> 1) How did you get convicted of stalking a girl if you don't want a
>> girl?
>>
>> *AND*
>>
>> 2) Why does every .ing girl in the country think that you want her
>> when you very clearly don't want a girl?
>>
>
> So what about Jesse Weed? She's the bitch you were convicted of
> stalking. What do we know about that?
>
> Well, we know that you did talk to her on a couple of occasions. We
> know that she called the police on you. We know that the police
> contacted you and told you to stop contacting her. We know that you
> weren't charged with anything because you hadn't done anything. And,
> we know that you stopped contacting her.
>
> So how did you get convicted of stalking her? If the police didn't
> charge you, how did you get convicted? If you stopped contacting her,
> how did you get convicted? Obviously something doesn't add up here.
>
> Obviously! And I'll leave it at that! Because I'm not about to
> jeopardise the millions I can sue these corrupt assclowns for!
>


It's really interesting! Because you complained to the police that you
were being stalked... But they didn't believe you! They must have
had a reason for not believing you! I wonder what that reason was?

We know that they say you have a mental illness, but at the time you
complained of being stalked, you hadn't done anything to give them
reason to question your mental health. They had no reason to not
believe you! They had no reason to not investigate your complaint!
They had no reason to question your mental health whatsoever!

So why did they ignore your complaint?

You didn't have a criminal record! You didn't have a history of mental
illness! And men *DO* get stalked! And the police knew all of these
things! So why did they ignore you? And on what grounds did they
ignore you?

252861. Re: Advice on migrating to Canada for IT workers 252861
252862. Re: Renewal case for PR status 252862
252863. Re: Advice on migrating to Canada for IT workers 252863
252864. Canadian multiculturalism 252864
252865. Re: Photo for PR-Spouse Spnsorship 252865
252866. Re: gun laws for new arrivals - toronto ? 252866
252867. Re: Canadian multiculturalism 252867
252868. Re: HELP 252868
252869. Re: Working in US as a TN 252869
252870. Re: Where do I apply for a C1 form please ? 252870
252871. Re: I can expect to die alone (with nothing) in the 2050s. Leaving 2
252872. To apply within canada 252872
252873. Re: Renewal case for PR status 252873
252874. Re: Renewal case for PR status 252874
252875. Re: To apply within canada 252875
252876. Re: Advice on migrating to Canada for IT workers 252876
252877. Re: To apply within canada 252877
252878. Re: Photo for PR-Spouse Spnsorship 252878
252879. Re: Photo for PR-Spouse Spnsorship 252879
252880. Re: Bringing Jewellery to Canada 252880