Your attorney is supposed to represent you and protect your interests. He
should not file complain unless it has been approved by you. Has this
attorney ever filed a mandamus complain against INS/USCIS?
"drvr1" wrote in message
news:1340507.1080768870@britishexpats.com...
>
> My lawyer insists on using only 1361
> so br it.
>
> But, I asked him to
> email me his complaint and there were 10 factaul mistakes in it! my
> address, the date of my interview, the date of a receipt letter ....
> etc.
>
> I am so mad. I fixed it and emailed it back. Then I asked him
> to email me back ti see it. He says he won't till he files it since
> he has already corrected what I asked him. What an /;,p,[,#.
>
>
> Originally posted by Aurora
> > it would be better to
> quote both 1391 and 1447(b) for venue if the action
> > seeks remedy
> bouth under mandamus and 1447(b).
> >
> > Same goes for jurisdiction;
> quote all laws that are applicable, such as
> > 28:1361, 13:1331,
> 8:1447(b), 5:704 and 5:706, 28:2201 and 28:2202, and
> > 8:1329.
> >
> >
> "drvr1" wrote in message
> > n-
> ews:1326134.1080151705@britishexpats.com"]news:1326134.1080151705@b-
> ritishexpats.com[/url]...
> > > Thanks, see what aurora says as
> well.
> > > Filing depends on the lawyer.
> > > They
> are getting me mad; it's
> > > almost three weeks after I
> hired them and
> > > every week
> > > they come up
> with a different excuse.
> > > Originally
> > > posted
> by waistophobic200
> > > > Hello Aurora and Dvr1
> > >
> >
> > > > in my case I
> > > used 1391 as the venue
> since I reside within the jurisdiction of the
> > > district
> court and one of the defendants also reside and conduct his
> >
> > business within the same jurisdiction.
> > > >
> >
> > > I looked at other complain
> > > and they all use
> 1391 as the venue
> > > > as far as the jurisdiction
> you
> > > may want to put all of them 1361, 1447 etc...
>
> > > >
> > > > Aurora may have more
> > > input
> later on.
> > > >
> > > > so Dvr1 when are you filling
> the case ??
> > > >
> > > > by
> > > the way
> take a look at the case below
> > > > there are very
> interesting
> > > aspect of the interpretation of 8 USC 1447,
> the case itself is really
> > > really complicated .....oh
> boy
> > > > ]http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/cases/2004,0323-
> http://www.ilw.com/lawyers/immigdaily/cases/2004,0323-
>
> > > Hovsepian.pdf[/url]
> > > >
> > > > also
> check this site :
> > > http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/-
> ~stefanko/BCIS/"]http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~stefanko/BCIS/[/url-
> ]
> > > interesting
> > > mandamus case and class
> action
> > > --
> > Posted via http://britishe-
> xpats.com/http://britishexpats.com
>
>
> --
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
|