National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]




Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorization ? Posted on: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:02:01 PDT

In article <34$307215$2469757$1118203762@britishexpats.com>, crg14624 writes:

> I really don't understand how families are split up by DHS. If
> someone got permission to move to the US before entering, then the
> entire family would ride along and get their green cards at the same
> time.

Are you saying the DHS never denies any AOS/Visa application?
Or are you saying that DHS has a 0% failure rate in determining which
application in legitimate, applying any sensible standard?
In the later case, families still might end up being split up but for
arguably legitimate reasons.
If so, why bother accepting appeals? All of them must be coming from
disgruntled people, who can't accept the fact that they're criminals.

> It seems that people who enter illegally, and then manage to aquire
> status via asylum or a fake marriage are the ones who can't bring
> their real spouse and kids over.

> The people who enter legally in a work/student status, eventually
> get their green card and then fall for someone in another country
> are the ones who get screwed.

Correct, but they're not the only ones who end up being screwed.

> Noone is forced to stay in the US, therefore, DHS doesn't split
> families.

Did it ever occur to you there might be mixed couples with different
nationalities?

What if DHS says "no" to the alien, and the home country of the alien
says no to whom they regard to be the alien?
Where does the couple move? They end up having to split up!

I personally know of one such case; in this case the U.S. wasn't
involved. It was a dutch / taiwanese couple.

This scenario is certainly also possible with the USA.

Best Regards,

Gerd

214643. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214645. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214646. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214654. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214663. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214664. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214670. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214672. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214677. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214680. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214751. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorization ?
214759. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214760. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214994. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214996. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
214999. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
215020. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
215094. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
215107. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio
215109. Re: Why USA should issue the dependant visa holders work-authorizatio