We are not trying to do anything illegal here....We have been comunicating
for over a year.(early 2004).phone, I M/cam, e.mail, every day some times
more & rarely less. She wants a better life, which we all can understand. I
am a dual business owner, while she is going to college for business. (last
year)
"Rete" wrote in message
news:34$309439$2505787$1119230213@britishexpats.com...
>
>> I am the "he", from U S, where she is from Philippines. Sorry I should
>> had
>> given that info before. I didn't know it maybe different with point of
>> origin, when someone is coming in to U S
>> "Rete" wrote in message
>> news:34$309439$2505365$1119213029@britishexpats.com...
>> >> Perhaps you guys may have info that may help us. (I am the
>> >> petitioner
>> >> for
>> >> fiance). I chose the exception route, because of a medical problem
>> >> with
>> >> blood clots forming while extended travel. (same as the anchor guy
>> >> who
>> >> died
>> >> in Iraq from heart attack) He didn't know he had the problem, I am
>> >> very
>> >> aware of it. I had many encounters that where near fatal over the
>> >> years
>> >> until the cause was found. Simply travel by long car, aircraft, or
>> >> stationary for extended time. I did not make the problem sound too
>> >> drastic
>> >> or important as I should have I guess.
>> >> Perhaps this is not something the exception rule was for, as I
>> >> thought
>> >> it was. I now have less than 30 days to appeal... what suggestions
>> >> would you
>> >> have?
>> >> (It was from Vermont service center) I will check in here every few
>> >> hours to see your replies. I will, get all the documentation I can
>> >> possibley
>> >> get, if it was only the lack of evidence. Tks for any help on this
>> > You don't say where your fiancee is from. If he is from a country
>> > that can visit you that would negate your plea for exception as he
>> > would be able to travel to you rather than the other way around. If
>> > he is in Canada or Mexico, you could drive. Or if in Europe, you
>> > could
>> > take a boat.
>> > --
>> > I'm not an attorney. This disclaimer is valid in NYS!
>> > Posted via http://britishexpats.com
>
> Yes, it would make a difference. The I-129f does not state that the USC
> have to be the one to travel only that the couple would have meet in
> person during the two years prior to application for fiancee visa. It
> is near impossible fro some people to obtain a visitor's visa to the US
> and that would strength the case for the USC would cannot travel. If
> the foreign loved one can obtain a visitor's visa and/or use the VWP,
> then there goes the loophole.
>
> As for yourself, please understand this is not said to be offensive but
> the Philipphines' records for mail order brides and fraudulent use of
> the Fiancee and Immediate Relative Visas means your petition will be
> thoroughly scruntized. Especially in light of the fact that you have
> never met this woman.
>
> --
> I'm not an attorney. This disclaimer is valid in NYS!
> Posted via http://britishexpats.com
|
