> "And now for the straight story..."
>
> "The goal is to show Congress and the media and the White
> House that we can organize ourselves, because we have not
> been very well-organized in the past," Juan Carlos Ruiz,
> who coordinated Monday's march in Washington, D.C., told
> the San Jose Mercury News."
>
> What utter lie. The plans for these protests have their roots in
> Mexico
> as early as 1982. Hundreds of thousands of Mexicans (including those
> first evacutated to Quintana Roo, to there learn the "capture of
> dollars" while soliciting sponsorship from visiting U.S. tourists)
> have
> been propgandized, instructed, conditioned and managed by Mexican
> governement both home and abroad (via the Mexican consulates plus
> their
> numerous sychophant Latin American Associations, newspapers and
> academic study groups).
>
> The protest I observed, and Mexican bystanders agreed, were being
> managed by even plain-clothes federales from Mexico.
>
> "In other cities, peaceful rallies emphasized a 'campaign for dignity'
> and the need for 'comprehensive' reforms" without any recognition,
> much
> less regard, for the absolute indignities they inflict routinelyon
> both
> native and naturalized Americans here in the U.S.A. or, as even
> CONSTITUIONALIZED, in Mexico.
>
> "Such euphemisms, like Monday's signs reading 'God bless
> America' and 'We have a dream,' are deliberately ambiguous.
> Organizers wanted the marches to be more about people and
> less about policy. Most television stations swallowed the
> bait and delivered news reports soft enough to follow "Sesame
> Street" on PBS."
>
> When they refer to "America" or, even only now, "Americans too", they
> are NOT referring to either the United States or United Staters."
>
> The mass produced and distribute placards reading "We are America too"
> was NO typo!
>
> "The reason for such an approach is obvious: If marchers made their
> demands the clear centerpiece of protests, the outcry from American
> taxpayers already fed up with the costs of illegal immigration would
> overwhelm the previously full mailboxes of every member of Congress."
>
> Even "We Shall Overcome" is NOT to them an expression over overcoming
> obstacles of even injustice rather than rising above everyone else.
>
> "Monday's march in Las Vegas might have been the country's most
> honest immigrant rally. Its leaders deserve credit for having
> the moxie to spell out their ideas of reform: no criminal
> penalties for illegals currently living and working in the
> United States; no fencing or other physical improvements to
> bolster security along our southern border; and a path to
> citizenship and amnesty for all illegal immigrants and their
> families."
>
> Why? Because they are in 'America' and not the U.S.A.; and they are
> thus "Americans too."
>
> "Talk about wanting something for nothing."
>
> But, as the ten-year old boy recited on local news here: "We built
> this
> country." How both pandy-assed and ignorant can anyone get?
>
> Chris Bury, for one: At the conclusion of a Report on Illegal Mexican
> "Immigration" on ---otherwise excellent--- Nightline, about a year
> ago,
> after reporting especially on a illegal Mexican labor union organizer
> in Las Vegas, Bury totally misinterpreted the man who in plain English
> kept exclaiming "We are strong" as if he was in the U.S.A. even
> illegally to do the U.S.A. a favor by exerting the supposed strength
> of
> Mexicans."
>
> Bury acutally summed up with an appeal to sympathize with the man, and
> even the mentality (of racist prepotencia) and other illegals for
> ultimate amnesty.
>
> "There's no acknowledgment that crossing a sovereign nation's borders
> and using all manner of fraud to make a living there is wrong. There's
> no spirit of compromise, no willingness to say, 'We recognize that our
> families are stretching the resources of your school districts, public
> hospitals and welfare rolls. In exchange for the ability to work here,
> we're willing to go along with the growing number of state
> laws that deny taxpayer-funded services to noncitizens.'"
>
> Because, as long propagandized and instructed they believe themselves,
> no matter where they go in the Americas they are Americans and thus
> have a right to be anywhere in the hemisphere.
>
> That non-Mexicans, Americans, by their twisted definition, too, do not
> have that right in Mexico is of no concern to them as such concern
> does
> not suit Mexico City's purpose.
>
> "Make no mistake, Monday's marchers believe the federal
> government should continue to ignore illegal immigration,
> that the United States of America should have no discernible
> borders and that citizens of Latin American nations have an
> unquestioned right to employment and education for their
> children here -- first come, first served..."
>
> Which is precisely what Bush has been telling them since DAY ONE!
>
> "Asians and Indians with engineering degrees will just have to wait --
> regardless of whether they speak or understand English."
>
> Wait? How many even South Americans are ever going to bother being
> processed for legal immigration if so-called amnesty (better stated
> surrender to coercion) is granted?
>
> "Imagine the reactions to today's news reports if, instead of
> seeing Latinos d.d in American flags, citizens saw signs
> that read, ;We don't need no stinking green cards,' 'Your
> laws don't matter,' 'Send my medical bills to your state
> legislature' and 'Bilingualism: It worked for Quebec.'"
>
> Their attempt to coopt even the U.S. Civil Rights Movement for their
> own nonsense is especially repugnant.
>
> "These opinions are not shared by all Hispanics. The Washington,
> D.C.-based Pew Hispanic Center and the Center for Immigration Studies
> point out that Latinos are far from unified on the issue of illegal
> immigration, and that those who favor enforcement of immigration laws
> are fearful of being labeled traitors to their culture."
>
> It gets worse than that: doing even just business with any Hispanic,
> invites disaster. If, with an automechanic for example and one assumes
> as one has to that one is dealing with a legal, if one must press for
> performance, or even redress, one never knows if the pressure will be
> taken as some kind of extortion by an, in reality, an illegal or the
> recourse of going to court could even end up in deportation for a man
> and his family.
>
> There are many more problems in everday business intercourse, which is
> making our economy exactly what the suspicious-laden and extortive
> economies from which the so-called "immigrants" are being tauted as
> escaping.
>
> " Rather than heed these trends and listen to the concerns of
> the majority, the U.S. Senate insists on enabling these
> demonstrators by sabotaging legislation intended to tighten
> our porous border, restore some congressional control over
> who may enter and reduce the rapid growth of a net-tax-
> recipient population that resists assimilation and could one
> day overwhelm public services, stagnate our economy and lower
> the quality of life in this nation."
>
> Whether they know it or not, they are selling out to Global Bush Inc.
>
> "These same senators have spent billions of dollars on the
> 'war on terror' and defended the need for the Department of
> Homeland Security, yet they won't spend the billions necessary
> to properly secure our border? They can't have it both ways.
>
> The United States government has an obligation to its citizens
> to control who enters the country. Disingenuous displays of
> patriotism by illegals and their supporters will never change
> that."
I still want to know if this means my grass won't get mowed this week?
Disgruntled
New Jersey
--
Posted via http://britishexpats.com |