Genaro wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:30:43 -0800, George Grapman wrote:
>
>> bvallely@... wrote:
>>>>>> In other words you have as much proof that there was fraud in Georgia
>>>>>> as you do for your claim that despite entering a not guilty plea
>>>>>> Limbaugh was never charged with a crime.;
>>>>> You know, you're right. I was thinking of the fact that Rush had
>>>>> never been caught committing a crime - I had forgotten about the
>>>>> publicity hungry DA who pissed away millions of the people of
>>>>> Florida's money, dropped the Constitution in the shredder, all on the
>>>>> desperate hope of shutting down a flow of information to as many as 20
>>>>> million people.
>>>> Was he charged with a crime? Yes or no?>
>>> .
>>> Yes, he was. Did he go to trial? Was he convicted? Did the people
>>> of Florida get anything, anything at all, for their millions spent and
>>> thousands of man hours lost?
>>
>> So you admit your claims that he was not charged were false.
>> No, tell us what we got for the millions that Starr spent
>> investigating Whitewater,filegate,travelgate and Vince Foster. Then tell
>> us what we got for all the time and money spent on Cisneros,especially
>> the final two years when there were not witnesses or subpoenas.
> -------
> We got an impeached and disbarred President exposed as a bald-faced liar
> and a first lady who is despised by half the country.
> -------
In other words what you got was not a single criminal charge against
Bill or Hillary and an acquittal in his impeachment trial. You also got
a president whose rating were higher during his impeachment than what
Bush currently has.
Tell us what Ken Starr said about the Clinton's and Whitewater,
travelgate,filegate and Vince Foster.
Any reason you snipped the parts about the Cisneros case? The one
that after spending the final two years calling no witnesses and
issuing no subpoenas came up empty? Guess it took two years on the
taxpayers to dime to compose a report that found nothing. |