On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:39:14 +0000, George Grapman wrote:
> Genaro wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:24:59 -0800, George Grapman wrote:
>>
>>> Genaro wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:30:43 -0800, George Grapman wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> bvallely@... wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In other words you have as much proof that there was fraud in Georgia
>>>>>>>>> as you do for your claim that despite entering a not guilty plea
>>>>>>>>> Limbaugh was never charged with a crime.;
>>>>>>>> You know, you're right. I was thinking of the fact that Rush had
>>>>>>>> never been caught committing a crime - I had forgotten about the
>>>>>>>> publicity hungry DA who pissed away millions of the people of
>>>>>>>> Florida's money, dropped the Constitution in the shredder, all on the
>>>>>>>> desperate hope of shutting down a flow of information to as many as 20
>>>>>>>> million people.
>>>>>>> Was he charged with a crime? Yes or no?>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> Yes, he was. Did he go to trial? Was he convicted? Did the people
>>>>>> of Florida get anything, anything at all, for their millions spent and
>>>>>> thousands of man hours lost?
>>>>> So you admit your claims that he was not charged were false.
>>>>> No, tell us what we got for the millions that Starr spent
>>>>> investigating Whitewater,filegate,travelgate and Vince Foster. Then tell
>>>>> us what we got for all the time and money spent on Cisneros,especially
>>>>> the final two years when there were not witnesses or subpoenas.
>>>> -------
>>>> We got an impeached and disbarred President exposed as a bald-faced liar
>>>> and a first lady who is despised by half the country.
>>>> -------
>>> In other words what you got was not a single criminal charge against
>>> Bill or Hillary and an acquittal in his impeachment trial. You also got
>>> a president whose rating were higher during his impeachment than what
>>> Bush currently has.
>>> Tell us what Ken Starr said about the Clinton's and Whitewater,
>>> travelgate,filegate and Vince Foster.
>>> Any reason you snipped the parts about the Cisneros case? The one
>>> that after spending the final two years calling no witnesses and
>>> issuing no subpoenas came up empty? Guess it took two years on the
>>> taxpayers to dime to compose a report that found nothing.
>> -------
>> Amazing how the Clintons maintain their popularity after so many of their
>> friends took the fall for them. It's as if there is some sort of
>> subliminal brainwashing or hypnosis going on.
>> -------
> Amazing how even after a Republican conducts the most extensive
> investigation of any president he finds nothing against the Clinton's
> other than lying about consensual . and amazingly a Republican senate
> acquitted him.
-------
Yet if it was you or me, we'd either be dead or behind bars for a long
time.
------- |