National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: Which way is easier Posted on: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:43:34 +0000 (UTC)

On Jan 10, 5:11=A0am, Carcass...@... wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My wife is Canadian and wants to become an American citizen. =A0She has
> a green card and has lived in the US since the 4th grade, so she meets
> the "Lawful Permanent Resident of the United States for at least five
> years" rule. =A0But I am a natural born American citizen so she meets
> the "have been married to and living with the same U.S. citizen for
> the last three years" requirement as well.
>
> You can only claim one of these eligibility requirements when applying
> for citizenship. =A0So my question is, is there any reason she should
> choose one eligibility requirement over the other? =A0Basically I am
> wondering if one makes it easier than the other.
>
> Thanks in advance.

The question I have for you is how long have you been married? Did
your greencard holder wife file adjust of status after her marriage to
you. Did you marry her before she was 21 years old. What was her
status in the US as green card holder, since she has been there since
the 4th grade. Why didn't she naturalize before the marriage? No date
for the 4th grade so cant figure out how may years she has been
there. Also has she ever left the US during here time in US. It will
make a impact on the calculations for the 3 year married to a US
citizen rule and the 5 year rule.

You should contact a immigration attorney.

manilacharlie@...

247659. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247659
247660. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247660
247661. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247661
247662. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247662
247663. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247663
247664. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247664
247665. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247665
247666. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247666
247667. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247667
247668. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247668
247669. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247669
247670. Re: Ron Paul Is The Solition- Mexican woman with three U.S. citizen c
247671. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247671
247672. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247672
247673. Re: Ron Paul Is The Solition- Mexican woman with three U.S. citizen
247674. Re: Ron Paul Is The Solition- Mexican woman with three U.S. citizen c
247675. Re: TOP POSTERS ARE RETARDS 247675
247676. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247676
247677. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247677
247678. Re: Jan 1 - Arizona firms brace for immigration sanctions law 247678