johnny@. wrote:
> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>> johnny@. wrote:
>>> _ Prof. Jonez _ wrote:
>>>> GeekBoy wrote:
>>>>> "Deadrat" wrote in message
>>>>> news:bX%wj.12785$Ch6.8026@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net...
>>>>>> John Rohan wrote in
>>>>>> news:9cba661b-ae2a-434d-8cf2-
>>>>>> 5799556b8baf@v3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com:
>>>>>>> On 26 Feb., 19:58, thedarkoneli...@... wrote:
>>>>>>>> I've heard for years about laws that entice illegals to jump
>>>>>>>> the border - to the effect that if they give birth in the U.S.
>>>>>>>> no matter the status of the mother and father, the baby is
>>>>>>>> automatically a citizen and gives the parents different status
>>>>>>>> than simply "illegal". I believe I've seen this referred to as
>>>>>>>> an "anchor baby". Specifically what statutes or laws are these,
>>>>>>>> where can I find more
>>>>>>>> info including who was responsible for drafting such laws in
>>>>>>>> the first place, and why despite outrage over illegal
>>>>>>>> immigration within the US population, such laws that would
>>>>>>>> seem to be an obvious incentive to cross illegally have
>>>>>>>> remained in effect.
>>>>>>> The law is the 14th ammendment to the US constitution which
>>>>>>> states: "Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the
>>>>>>> United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are
>>>>>>> citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they
>>>>>>> reside." I disagree that this means that children born to people
>>>>>>> illegally in the US are automatically citizens, but
>>>>>>> unfortunately, that's how the courts have interpreted it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> JR
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just out of curiosity what else could it mean? What about "All
>>>>>> persons born ... in the United States" don't you understand?
>>>>> The part about "AND subject to the jurisdiction thereof"
>>>> So an ignoramus like you is asserting that Tourists and Aliens
>>>> present in the U$A without papers are NOT subject to U$ laws ?
>>> That is correct.
>>
>> You really are dumber than a bucket of dirt, aren't you boy?
>>
>>> If they are arrested for murder, their consulate
>>> must be informed to provide legal help, and in the case of Mexico, a
>>> Mexican that commits murder in the United States cannot receive the
>>> death penalty.
>>
>> What's that Treaty got to do with whether or not the U$ has
>> jurisdiction over them and their case ?
>
> I'm not talking about the treaty that Carter signed, I'm talking about
> Mexicans illegally in the United States that commit murder. Mexico
> appealed the death sentences of all Mexicans to the International
> Court, and the court agreed with Mexico, and George Bush agreed with
> the court.
So they ARE subject to U$ law and jurisdiction, eh numbnuts?
>
>>
>>> Illegal Mexicans that are stopped by police, with no license, and no
>>> insurance, are allowed to drive off into the sunset. An American
>>> citizen's car would be towed.
>>
>> Did your racism make you stupid, or did your stupidity make
>> you a racist ?
>
> You tell me why
There is no explaination why a racist piece of white-trash like
you is so god-damn ignorant... really, none at all.
>>
>>
>>>> Were you born stupid, or did your mother abuse you as a child,
>>>> you pig-ignorant racist piece of shit?
>>> I seems you are the ignorant racist piece of shit.
>>
>> You're lying again, you stump-stupid asswipe.
>
> You need to have a conversation with br549, and see which one of you
> would get tired of call each other racists first.
You need to go . yourself you lowlife white-trash maggot.
|