David Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:43:22 -0800, Rudy Canoza
> wrote:
>
>> David Johnston wrote:
>>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:40:56 -0800, Rudy Canoza
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Irrelevant - the citizenship clause does not read "subject to the laws".
>>>> It reads "subject to the jurisdiction", and as the intent of the
>>>> authors of the clause is clearly understood from the debate in the
>>>> Senate, that means much *more* than merely subject to the laws.
>>> Which debate in the Senate woudl that be?
>> The debate in the Senate among the senators debating the 14th Amendment.
>
> Where can I find this debate?
I already supplied the links once in a direct reply to you, so, pretty
obviously, you're being disingenuous and dishonest. You won't read them. |