National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: Great Britain gets _jus soli_ birthright citizenship right Posted on: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:01:22 -0500

Rudy Canoza wrote:
> Here is what the British Home Office says about birth in the UK to
> non-qualifying parents:
>
> If you were born in the United Kingdom to parents who are not British
> citizens and are not legally settled here:
>
> Even if you were born in the United Kingdom, you will not be a
> British citizen if neither of your parents was a British citizen or
> legally settled here at the time of your birth. This means you are
> not a British citizen if, at the time of your birth, your parents
> were in the country temporarily, had stayed on without permission, or
> had entered the country illegally and had not been given permission
> to stay here indefinitely.
>
>
> http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/britishcitizenship/othernationality/Britishcitizenship/borninukorqualifyingterritory/
>
>
>
> That is exactly the policy that we should adopt, at a minimum. In fact,
> something very much like it is *exactly* what was intended by the
> authors of the 14th amendment. In *NO* way did they intend that
> children born to aliens in the country, particularly those who did not
> enter the country legally, should be born as American citizens.
>

Of course not but it is not policy we need but adherence to the law.



----== Posted via Pronews.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.pronews.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

250313. Re: Should Anchor Babies Get Automatic Citizenship? 250313
250314. Re: Should Anchor Babies Get Automatic Citizenship? 250314
250315. Re: Citizenship clause - what does it mean? 250315
250316. Don't change the Subject. 250316
250317. Re: Should Anchor Babies Get Automatic Citizenship? 250317
250318. Re: Ending birthright citizenship would not be "punishing" the would
250319. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25031
250320. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250321. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250322. "Subject to the jurisdiction" is the phrase. Allegiance is another 25
250323. Re: Should Anchor Babies Get Automatic Citizenship? 250323
250324. Re: Ending birthright citizenship would not be "punishing" the would
250325. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250326. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250327. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250328. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250329. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25032
250330. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25033
250331. Re: Rudy Canoza: "Rewrite the laws so I can be distinguished!" 25033
250332. Re: Lou Dobbs - Hate Master 250332