On Feb 14, 6:31=A0pm, "lucky.illegal.alien"
wrote:
> RIPPED FROM THE BLOG FOR ILLEGALS FOR YOUR VIEWING PLEASURE!
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/14/us/14immig.html
>
> Juan Muhammed Kim
> Executive Director
> The American Secret Society of Illegals
>
> http://americansecretsocietyofillegals.blogspot.com
> GO TO BLOG FOR VERSION WITH PICTURES
>
> We once again applaud the New York Times for the silliest headline of
> the century regarding their intense desire to bing in as many illegals
> as they can:
>
> By MICHAEL FALCONE
> Published: February 13, 2009
>
> =93100,000 PARENTS OF CITIZENS WERE DEPORTED OVER 10 YEARS!!!=94
>
> Can you actually believe those fools expressing such crocodile tears
> over the illegal immigrant parents of children born in the United
> States being deported and taking their anchor babies with them?
>
> The first sentence of the times story says it all:
>
> =93WASHINGTON =97 Of nearly 2.2 million immigrants deported in the decade
> ended 2007, more than 100,000 were the parents of children who, having
> been born in the United States, were American citizens, according to a
> report issued Friday by the Department of Homeland Security.=94
>
> Sure, illegals love having a family just as much as citizens and legal
> immigrants, but the overwhelming reason to have a child born in the
> good =91ole gullible U.S. of A. is to =93anchor=94 the family here, hence
> the terms for the snot nosed brats.
>
> Only the far, far, far, faaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrhhhhhh left such
> as the soft, flabby and pink reporters and editors of the New York
> Times can turn around and quote a Bronx Hispanic congressman as
> saying: =93=93If they took their children back,=94 he said of the deporte=
es,
> =93then technically we deported an American citizen.=94
>
> Oh, we are so cruel, the Times wants legal citizens to believe, and we
> applaud the Times for ignoring a relevant fact we hope Americans never
> discover: only two nations in the entire world of 215 or so countries
> confer automatic citizenship on babies of illegal residents.
> The USA is certainly the biggest sucker in the world on this.
>
> It would just take a law passed by Congress and signed by the
> president to change this practice, but our beloved lefty allies have
> convinced their fellow Americans that it is a sacred constitutional
> right to confer citizenship on the babies of illegals.
>
> So ridiculous. The New York Times knows perfectly well that the U.S.
> practice of giving citizenship is an unbelievable privilege but they
> flail American guilt with the whips of their words to keep the yahoos
> in line so they=92ll never, never ask the question we fear the most:
> =93Why the hell do we give citizenship to babies of illegals?=94
>
> IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERY ASSI MEMBER AND EVERY ILLEGAL IN
> THIS COUNTRY TO MAKE SURE AMERICANS NEVER FIND OUT ABOUT THIS. KEEP ON
> BANGING ON GUILT INTO THEIR HEADS AND HEARTS!!!!!!!!!
>
> Read and join:http://americansecretsocietyofillegals.blogspot.com
>
> Buy for your neighbors who want to come on over and partake of the
> largress of Americans, just buy on Amazon.com:
> =93THE OFFICIAL SECRET HANDBOOK FOR ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS.=94
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Official-Secret-Handbook-Illegal-Immigrants/dp/...
>
> OF COURSE, SOME MIGHT SAY THE WAY WE USE BABIES TO PLUNK OURSELVES
> THIS EQUALS THE IMAGE BELOW. TOTAL BALDERDASH, TO QUOTE ILLEGAL
> BRITISH IMMIGRANT HIRHAM GOODBODY.
>
> Foolish N.Y. Times story in full:
> WASHINGTON =97 Of nearly 2.2 million immigrants deported in the decade
> ended 2007, more than 100,000 were the parents of children who, having
> been born in the United States, were American citizens, according to a
> report issued Friday by the Department of Homeland Security.
>
> But the department lacks data that might have addressed questions left
> unanswered by the report, like the number of American children who
> were left behind in the United States or, alternatively, exited the
> country with their deported parents. Nor could the report say in how
> many instances both parents of such children were deported.
>
> Similarly, said Representative Jos=E9 E. Serrano, Democrat of New York,
> since no one knows how many children a given deportee had, the number
> of affected children could be much higher than 108,434, the exact
> number of deported parents of American citizens.
>
> So =93the problem goes deeper than just the numbers you see,=94 said Mr.
> Serrano, who requested the study. He called the circumstance =93tragic.=
=94
> =93If they took their children back,=94 he said of the deportees, =93then
> technically we deported an American citizen. No matter which side of
> the immigration issue you fall on, there=92s something wrong with the
> notion of kicking American citizens out of their own country.=94
>
> The Homeland Security Department=92s office of inspector general, which
> conducted the review, said it had ordered a look at the feasibility of
> tracking down more data about the deportations.
>
> Mr. Serrano, who represents a heavily Hispanic district in the Bronx,
> is vice chairman of the House Appropriations subcommittee that
> oversees spending on the department. He has introduced legislation
> that would allow immigration judges to take family status into account
> when deciding on deportations.
> Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration
> Studies, a policy institute in Washington that supports tighter
> controls on immigration, said immigrant parents of children born here
> should not receive special treatment.
>
> =93Should those parents get off the hook just because their kids are put
> in a difficult position?=94 Mr. Krikorian said. =93Children often suffer
> because of the mistakes of their parents.=94
I don't see what the problem is, the kids can always go with the
parents... |