National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]




Re: The Elephant debate. Posted on: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 15:32:52 +0100

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 22:09:02 +0100, nomail@please.invalid (Johan
W. Elzenga) wrote:

>Hans-Georg Michna wrote:

>> >I'm afraid I agree with many rangers in the Kruger who
>> >have devoted many lifetimes living with nature, and they
>> >all recommend culling. Elephants do destroy the bush
>> >and when the rain doesn't come the flora just cannot
>> >cope. Starvation does occur within certain areas that
>> >are over populated. As the Kruger is fast becoming since
>> >green people have made it politically incorrect to cull.

>> Something is missing here. You still have to explain why
>> elephants didn't "need culling" for many millions of years, and
>> suddenly now they do.

>Because they could roam free for millions of years, and now that is no
>longer possible.

Johan,

but it is still possible, particularly if we want to keep it
possible.

Of course, if you force elephants into a very small, fenced
area, then all bets are off. I'm opposed to doing that.

Hans-Georg

--
No mail, please.