In article <1135738633.046911.132290@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Tchiowa wrote:
>My last SQ flight (last week) they had 60 different movies (on demand)
>(including all 3 LOTR) about the same number of TV shows plus a similar
>number of specials (documentaries, sports, etc.)
Sounds alright, if you are into this sort of thing. I am not much of a
movie guy - and I certainly could not care less about LOTR. If I can't
sleep, I'll read a book or work. But for someone who cares about IFE,
I guess SQ might be a good choice. I'd rather have a nonstop flight
and get wherever I am going quicker.
>Thai is an average Asian airline. SQ and CX are a cut above anything
>you'll find in the US.
Too bad they only fly to a handful of cities in the US.
>>In my experience, Northwest's FAs can be brusque, and they certainly
>>don't look too fresh, but my interactions with FAs are usually limited
>>to ``chicken or beef'' and ``pass the blanket,'' so it's pretty much
>>all the same to me.
>
>Then you definitely haven't flown SQ. :-)
They don't fly to my part of the world. I've been averaging between
100K and 150K miles every year, and I don't think I've ever flown
on a route served by SQ. But then again, I hardly ever go to Asia
(outside Japan).
>FAs in their 20's, stone foxes, with floor length dresses slit in the
>front "all the way" so their legs are popping in and out as they walk
>through the aisles.
Hm. Is this supposed to be good or bad?
|