Subject: Re: Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents ]
Travel:[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]

[ Webmail Login ] [ Immigration, Travel Forum Australia | Canada | USA ]

Forum

Live chat

[ Home ][ Group Home ][ Random article ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]

Subject: Re: Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible

Posted on: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:26:15 EST

"khobar" wrote in
news:vm1Lf.4220$Sp2.802@fed1read02:

> "TRUTH" wrote in message
> news:Xns977210AF492ADtruth@130.81.64.196...
>> "khobar" wrote in
>> news:apTKf.4201$Sp2.2506@fed1read02:
>>
>> >
>> > "TRUTH" wrote in message
>> > news:Xns97728BD8884Etruth@130.81.64.196...
>> >> Thank you for all the responses. It's nice to get other opinions.
>> >> There's a few things that weren't commented on though.
>> >>
>> >
>> > At no time were any of the aircraft flying blind, thus the
>> > established facts as to what happened that day are completely
>> > consistent with what the article claims. Oops.
>> >
>> > Paul Nixon
>>
>>
>>
>> The government's version of 9/11 is not established fact... not to
>> those who can read between the lines :)
>
> Obviously you are reading between the lines - literallly.
>
> And I agree that the "Government's version" is not established fact -
> it's merely consistent with established fact.
>
> Paul Nixon
>
>
>

Where are the facts? You point to ONE fact that shows flight 77 hit the
Pentagon.

[ Home ][ Group Home ][ Random article ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]