Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-B20A82.14274422022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:
> In article ,
> TRUTH wrote:
>
>> It was a 360 degree diving precision maneuver.
>
> Not really. It was a 360 degree "hunt around until we find the target,
> then almost miss, even though you can see it from dozens of miles
away."
>
> That's like calling running your car into a wall at 60 MPH a "precision
> driving maneuver."
>
>> Do you have qualifications to refute the aeronautical engineer who
>> quote the article may I ask please?
>
> So far, about half of the people who have been responding to this silly
> bit of conspiracy theory have those qualifications, including private
> pilots and ex-military fighter jocks.
>
The government's version is a conspiracy theory, since there's no
evidence to back it up. Therefore anyone believing the government's
version is a conspiracy theorist. You think there's evidence? Prove it |