National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles Posted on: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:12:38 +0000 (UTC)


Tchiowa wrote:
> Cyrus Afzali wrote:
> >
> > Well, this only has relevance in Germany, just as a U.S. court ruling
> > would only have relevance in the U.S.
>
> US government employees have been required to "turn in" their miles for
> a long time. Basically the government monitors their accounts and
> requires them to use their miles for business trips rather than
> personal use.

They stopped doing that around a decade ago. It turns out that in the
USA there are some IRS tax rulings that for a business to try to grab
the miles make it more trouble than its worth.


-hh

618854. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618861. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618863. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618864. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618868. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618869. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618870. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618871. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618873. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618874. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618985. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618989. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618994. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618995. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
618997. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
619455. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles
619460. Re: Court ruling on frequent flyer miles