Dave Frightens Me wrote:
> On 24 Jul 2006 15:24:45 -0700, "Al Czervik"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Dave Frightens Me wrote:
> >> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 02:49:50 +0200, Mxsmanic
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Dave Frightens Me writes:
> >> >
> >> >> Your logic is broken. No-one said anything about heating.
> >> >
> >> >You say that education can compensate for excessive heat. Logically,
> >> >then, education can also compensate for excessive cold. Thus, there's
> >> >no more need for heating systems than there is for air conditioning
> >> >systems.
> >>
> >> As cold does not mean hot, your logic is broken.
> >>
> >> Believe it or not, they are two very different things.
> >
> >No they aren't - ask a physics teacher.
>
> What physics teacher would say that cold means hot and vice versa?
Every physics teacher would. Learn what heat means. Hot and cold are
relative terms, not absolute, that pertain to the amount of heat a body
has.
|