Lefty wrote:
> Annie.Orange@... wrote:
> > avery wrote:
> > > wrote in message
> > > news:1156112063.561439.248300@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> > > >
> > > > Thomas wrote:
> > > You see, hetero.ual
> > > >> males want a real woman, not a pseudo woman with a dick and balls. They
> > > >> don't want to romance something that looks like a woman and only to get
> > > >> to
> > > >> the point where you're on the couch getting into it pretty hot and heavy
> > > >> only to have a penis come flying out of her panties. Do you not
> > > >> understand
> > > >> the difference between hetero.uality and homo.uality? Maybe you can
> > > >> take a remedial class.
> > > >
> > > > I think it's silly, that's the point. I think caring about . organs
> > > > is superficial.
> > >
> > > If my boyfriend came home with a brand new vagina I don't think I'd be
> > > terribly turned on. Does that make me superficial?
> >
> > Well, something like that would probably be preceded by a huge
> > personality change, and that can cause a riff in or the end of a
> > relationship. But, if that change didn't occur and you loved him on a
> > deeper level, why would you really care if he turned his schlong into a
> > vagina? He'd still be HIM...just no dick. All the things you love about
> > his personality and your relationship on an emotional level would still
> > be the same. You'd still be able to orgasm with him. The only
> > difference would be that he would no longer have that one organ.
> >
> > So, do you love the man or do you love the dick?
> >
> > If you love the dick that's cool for you, no judgement here. Like I
> > said, superficial isn't always bad...it's your life, you live it how
> > you want it.
>
>
> She could still love the man, but reject the vagina because the .
> would never be right for her again. Please try to understand this.
Wouldn't she owe it to the relationship to give it a TRY?
|