Nan wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:11:04 +0100, ChocolateChip_Wookie
> <"wookie[at]bluelotusblossom[dot]com"> wrote:
>
>> Jamie Clark wrote:
>>> ChocolateChip_Wookie" <"wookie[at]bluelotusblossom[dot]com wrote:
>>>> Nan wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:09:33 GMT, "Kent"
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Nan" wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actually, it's "No, it's not all about you and your kids."
>>>>>>> Oh, I think it's a matter of perspective, don't you think? You
>>>>>>> see us as selfish and we see you as sniveling, whiny children.
>>>>>> Actually, most CF people would be just fine if you'd keep YOUR
>>>>>> "sniveling, whiny children" AWAY from us, as well as your demands
>>>>>> for fawning special treatment just because something has grown in
>>>>>> your uterus. It's a little thing called "consideration for other
>>>>>> people", ya know...
>>>>> Yeah, yeah, we've all heard your tales of Pity Me I Have To Endure
>>>>> Children. Good thing "Most CF people" I know don't behave as you do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nan
>>>>>
>>>> Ahhh...'CF' definition anyone?
>>> Child Free
>>>
>> 'Child Free'? By choice? Or by accident and biology (or lack of)?
>
> By Choice for most of them, I believe.
>
> Nan
>
Didnt that used to be called a 'spinster'? or am I confusing it with
'barren old hag'? |