On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:26:18 GMT, Strife767
puked:
>On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:53:04 -0400, lab~rat >:-) wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:15:05 GMT, Strife767
>> puked:
>>
>>> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:33:38 -0400, Sancho Panza
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Strife767" wrote in message
>>>> news:op.tgf0g4mu5i5s70@chris...
>>>>
>>>>> Love is about desire, and I say it's silly to prohibit, or look down
>>>>> upon
>>>>> those who have strong enough feelings for each other that they _want_
>>>>> to
>>>>> hug and kiss all the time, even in public.
>>>>
>>>> Where did the idea arise that that was all that was transpiring?
>>>
>>> Whatever it was, it wasn't explicit ., or else the report would have
>>> said so (it would make the story a lot more 'sensational'). Any step
>>> down
>>> from there basically falls into what I was talking about.
>>
>> Of course the 'report' is from the Advocate, a gay newspaper.
>
>Not originally.
>
>http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/articles/060925ta_talk_collins
>
>_Now_ what's your argument? Bet you feel pretty stupid now. In fact the
>New Yorker article makes it even _clearer_ that they were picked on
>unfairly.
I stand corrected. When a conservative periodical like the New Yorker
has a story, undoubtedly it's not slanted. LOL
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere? |