On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:43:20 GMT, flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>
>On 15-Dec-2006, Hatunen wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:46:53 GMT, flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >On 15-Dec-2006, James A. Donald wrote:
>> >
>> >> But if the trees are symbols of a religion, the way the
>> >> menorah is
>> >
>> >As you uave been told, the government has declared them
>> >both secular. So, if insist the menorah is religious, you have
>> >to agree the tree is. And if you insist the tree isn't, then you
>> >have to agree that the menorah deserves to be disaplyed
>> >with it.
>>
>> The tree is religious; it's just not Christian.
>
>Heehee - yes, there is that.
>But, then again, that would mean you could bring in the creches, too :-)
>
>Susan
Ah, but since they "know" that "Zeus" is not "God" they don't see it as any with
more significance than "Halloween" decorations.
Ben |