National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Re: Children on planes Posted on: 25 Dec 2006 10:26:04 -0800

On 23 Jun 2007, Jim Davis wrote:

> On Jun 23, 3:46 pm, Franklin wrote:
>> On 23 Jun 2007, Jim Davis wrote:
>>
>>
>> > X-No-Archive: Yes
>> > On Jun 23, 3:04 pm, Franklin wrote relivant
>>
>> Sorry Jim, must have used my old profile. Will check it.
>
> Your stalking & x-posting has nothing to do with air travel. Take it
> elsewhere.
>
> > BTW am intrigued: why do you use X-N-A?
>
> My posts are gone in 6 days, and are not archived. Anyone who wants
> to stalk me based on past posts will have to work for it.
>

Jim, could you be behaving in a way which would make people want to
stalk you?

Free Usenet servers such as news.readfreenews.net hold about six months
of Usenet history and this includes XNA posts. So XNA seems less
useful.

For example, this is a Christmas Day post with XNA. Alos note that it's
crossposted.

===============

From: "Jim Davis"
Subject: Re: Children on planes
Date: 25 Dec 2006 10:26:04 -0800
Message-ID: <1167071164.215835.53760@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.27.76.237
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1167071168 6569 127.0.0.1 (25 Dec 2006
18:26:08 GMT)
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
.NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Injection-Info: 73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.27.76.237;
posting-account=m1VNmw0AAABMXMrPEw49bIBh7K9E1znd
Newsgroups: rec.travel.air,alt.support.childfree

X-No-Archive: Yes

Sarah Czepiel wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 12:40 "ant" wrote:
>
> :>-L. wrote:
> :>> Dori wrote:
> :>> > He brought the little varmint to the office.
> :>>
> :>> You don't work there, why do you care?
> :>
> :>Because it validates the practice and others think it's OK to
> :>do it.
>
> He's a nice looking kid. I wouldn't have a problem having him
> visit the office.


Ahhhh - Now I understand.
The cuteness of the child is directly proportional to its behaviour.