On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 10:43:25 +0200, Martin wrote:
>On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 17:12:35 +1000, Dave Witmarsh wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:01:39 +0200, Tim C.
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Following up to Dave Witmarsh :
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 01:19:13 -0700, NotABushSupporter
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Tim C. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Following up to Dave Witmarsh :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>It's pretty clear what the OP meant when he said there was "no
>>>>>>>attendant to complain to" - obviously he wasn't able to find one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then he should have said words to the effect of "I couldn't find one".
>>>>>> Stuck in the middle of the plane while everyone's trying to get to their
>>>>>> seats - nobody has a chance. Just what did he expect?
>>>>>
>>>>>What about when everyone wasn't trying to get to their seats?
>>>>>Didn't he understand the issue BEFORE he walked past the divider?
>>>>
>>>>When, by his account, there was no attendant available either.
>>>
>>>Apparently there were no attendants at all until it was too late.
>>
>>Now you're catching on.
>
>Note "Apparently". Of course there were attendants.
Not readily availabe to the passenger.
>
>>
>>>There's normally at least one by the door when you come in. I bet there
>>>were then.
>>
>>Yes, but that was before the OP realised there was a problem
>
>10 minutes before he landed at Schiphol?
The OP realised that there was a problem long before that. The purser
didn't respond to his repeated request to see her until ten minutes
before the flight landed, in the hope that the problem would go away. |
