National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]




Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere Posted on: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:39:35 -0500

"Fritz Owl" wrote:

>
> "tim....." wrote in message
> news:5fu2faF3egtt4U1@mid.individual.net...
>>
>> "Fritz Owl" wrote in message
>> news:f7bvu0$adf$1@aioe.org...
>>>
>>> "tim....." wrote in message
>>> news:5frd52F3ehd3eU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Fritz Owl" wrote in message
>>>> news:f79175$adq$1@aioe.org...
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote in message
>>>>> news:1184260913.541775.205200@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> Heathrow could lose European crown
>>>>>> Jonathan Prynn, Evening Standard
>>>>>> 12 July 2007, 11:25am
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heathrow is in danger of losing its status as Europe's leading
>>>>>> airport as thousands of passengers switch to rival facilities.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you are going to England, the far more restrictive rules on
>>>>> carryons for flights that begin or end in the U.K, its just plain
>>>>> easier to fly to Paris and then drive to the U.K.
>>>>
>>>> In theory the same restrictions apply to rest of Europe.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed, the Brits seem to be more strict on enforcement,
>>>
>>> Well, this is advised if you are carrying things like laptops,
>>> or any other expensive electronic equipment. I have been
>>> in the Internet radio business for a long time, and you
>>> do NOT want to have to check expensive equipment
>>> into checked baggage.
>>
>> The you have to make special arrangements, don't you.
>>
>> I am sure that there are a very small number of people
>> who really need carry on extra luggage, but they are
>> outweighed 1000 to 1 by the people whos only reason
>> is "I don't want to have to wait at the carousel".
>
> Well, it appears I will be headed for a skating competition in
> Sheffield, in October, and I will have a 451 mile drive
> from DeGaulle airport in Paris to Sheffield, unless
> Britain decides to end the total ban on carryons that
> was imposed last year. Even flying into Manchester,
> the closest airport, I will STILL have to DRIVE to
> get to Sheffield.

More useless information from this poster.

The ban on carry-ons was dropped a long time ago. You can also fly into
SZD, Robin Hood Sheffield.

649086. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649087. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649094. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649100. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649108. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649113. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649115. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649157. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649158. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649182. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649266. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649270. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649271. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649276. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649277. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649287. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649288. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649297. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649298. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere
649299. Re: Heathrow falling pax numbers ! going elsewhere