On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 05:17:59 +0200, Mxsmanic
wrote:
>I doubt that windshear was a factor here. Chances are the crew made a poor
>decision to land in weather that was really too severe for a landing, and bad
>things happened in consequence.
You are probably right. To go to Krabi instead would not have made
such a difference. A parallel here to the crash in Suratthani a few
years ago? |
652140. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652140652141. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652141652142. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652142652143. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652143652144. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652144652145. Re: Ryanair says ready to launch 80 Milan routes
652145652146. Re: Ryanair says ready to launch 80 Milan routes
652146652147. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652147652148. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652148652149. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652149652150. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652150652151. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652151652152. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652152652153. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652153652154. Re: Ryanair says ready to launch 80 Milan routes
652154652155. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652155652156. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652156652157. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652157652158. Re: And then he said, "Wait, I think I have the wrong place!"
652158652159. Re: CNN article on problems in Air Travel, as seen by FAA
652159
|
|
|