On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:03:55 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:
:>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>>
:>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:20:17 +1300, Greg Procter
:>> wrote:
:>>
:>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:39:12 +1300, Greg Procter
:>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 13:11:54 +1300, Greg Procter
:>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:19:51 +1300, Greg Procter
:>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Sarah Czepiel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 10:31:57 +1300, Greg Procter
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>mrtravel wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> Greg Procter wrote:
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> > Laws change over time - that was 40+ years ago.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> > You yanks were still lynching black people in the streets and avoiding
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> > giving the survivors the vote back then.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> So, are you are saying it is currently illegal for anyone under 16 to be
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>> employed doing the same work as an adult? You are positive about this?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> :>Not at all - I haven't been under 16 for more than 40 years.
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>> Yeah, like 20 years more than those 40 years, right ya old duffer? :)
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Huhh?
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>16 + 20 + 40 = 76. I'm certainly not 76 years old.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> I know you're 71.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>> :>Try adding; less than 16 + more than 40.
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>> :>You know more years than I do!
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> BWAHAHAHAHAHA !!!
:>> :>> :>>
:>> :>> :>> I'm 54. You have a daughter almost as old as I am, Procter.
:>> :>> :>
:>> :>> :>30 is almost as old as 54??? You really aren't into maths, are you
:>> :>> :>Sarah!
:>> :>>
:>> :>> I remember you told me almost 5 years ago your daughter had been a
:>> :>> commercial airline captain and had then moved on to do other things.
:>> :>
:>> :>Pilot - yes, she was a commercial pilot, but the only real way to jump
:>> :>the experience barrier required by major airlines is to work somewhere
:>> :>like Papua-New Guinea or Saudi-Arabia, not good options for a woman.
:>>
:>> There's another lie you've told Procter. You said she was a
:>> commercial airlines captain/pilot.
:>
:>Yes she was.
:>Occassional work on demand with a pay rate that didn't pay the bills.
:>It wasn't a 747 pilot job.
Now your parsing your answer. Was she or was she not a " Commercial
airlines pilot" ? I am not asking if she held a commercial pilots
license.
:>> :>> Looks like your over 40's daughter lies about her occupations just
:>> :>> like her old Dad.
:>> :>
:>> :>"Over 40's daughter"? I had some good times in my youth but I'm not
:>> :>aware of any resulting daughters from that time!
:>> :>
:>> :>>
:>> :>> :>I've just turned 58.
:>> :>>
:>> :>> 71 or 58 you lied when you said " You know more years than I do! "
:>> :>> you complete fraud.
:>> :>
:>> :>You claimed to know 71 years - that's more than I do.
:>>
:>> Three years would be more than you know, Procter.
:>
:>71 is three more years than 58??? Where do you get these numbers???
Christchurch University....? |