On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 09:55:28 +1300, Greg Procter
wrote:
>mrtravel wrote:
>>
>> Greg Procter wrote:
>>
>> >>All of the publish reports of the event state this is what happened.
>> >>The only disagreement seems to come a feeble-minded person in NZ
>> >
>> >
>> > Care to cite such a published report?
>>
>> I have cited things in the past for you.
>> I am still waiting to first a reputable cite.
>>
>> You asked for a cite that would apply to tipping at McD's.
>> I posted one.
>>
>> Now, why don't you post a cite stating the "terrorists" flew to the US?
>
>The known terrorists _didn't_ fly to the USa.
>It's the unknown ones we don't know about - had the US intelligence
>organisations co-operated we might well have found out and possibly even
>have caught them.
>Two were caught, two others known by name and appearance, one more known
>by appearance. The estimate is that at least _seven_ terrorists were
>involved.
>That means at least _two_ terrorists escaped without being identified.
>Given the limited number of routes out of New Zealand and the fact that
>the only quick routes are NZ-US and NZ-Australia, the likelyhood that at
>least two terrorists escaped via the US is very high.
>As US intelligence would not co-operate we will never know.
>The US supports terrorist acts against it's allies.
There is no point in sharing intelligence with a country that is
openly hostile to us, sympathetic to the terrorists and have no means
of fighting terrorists even if the weren't.
|