Greg Procter wrote:
> Craig Welch wrote:
>
>>Greg Procter wrote:
>>
>>>Craig Welch wrote:
>>>
>>>>Greg Procter said:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Mr. Travel" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Maybe Proggie's daughter knows it?
>>>>>>After all, doesn't she fly the 707, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787,
>>>>>>310, 380, A4, B17, KC-135,
>>>>>
>>>>>You've placed yourself firmly in the liars camp with that imaginary
>>>>>story.
>>>>
>>>>Liar? How can he be held a liar by asking a question?
>>>
>>>He implied that my daughter had flown a long list of aircraft without
>>>any knowledge of the subject.
>>
>>There is a clear distinction between an implication and a lie.
>
>
> I'm sure yanks have lots of distinctions between types of lies, just as
> Eskimos have numerous distinctions between types of snow.
> For the rest of the world, one lie type and one snow type is enough.
>
>
>>But if there was an implication with which you're not happy it was
>>based, it seems to me, on information provided by your good self.
>
>
> Only two of those aircraft types were mentioned by me, and then only in
> joke.
You said the info about being a 747 instructor was a joke. Are you
saying the 737 part was also a "joke".
So, you have this daughter you are so very proud of. She flies jet.
So, instead of talking about the ones she can fly, you make up stories
using the ones she can't fly.
Is this because you made the daughter up, or simply don't know what she
flies? |