Greg Procter wrote:
> Craig Welch wrote:
>> Greg Procter wrote:
>>> Craig Welch wrote:
>>>> Greg Procter wrote:
>>>>> "Mr. Travel" wrote:
>>>>>> Greg Procter wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You claim to be a yank - that makes the yank dollar _your_ dollar. Are
>>>>>>> you always this stupid?
>>>>>> When did he claim to be a Yank?
>>>>> A few days ago.
>>>> You'll continue a lie for a long time since the moment it's disproven,
>>>> won't you Greg?
>>>>
>>>> As indicated, I never claimed to be a yank. *You* claimed that I was a
>>>> yank. Or have you forgotten?
>>> Craig, you've continually corrupted the subject line of this sequence of
>>> postings, I assume because you wish to make tracing your lies as
>>> difficult as possible.
>> Huh? I can search every post on this thread in seconds. Why can't you?
> What am I searching for? A posting with _two_ links. AFAIK there isn't
> any search engine that can search for that.
My goodness Greg, how many times do I have to explain this to you?
I provided you with a pre-formed google search of all the posts from you
with a link in them. All you have to do is look in each one of those for
*two* links.
It's not really that difficult.
> Especially if you've cut one of them.
How could I cut one of them? I don't have any control over google.
>> I've already provided you with a link to a google search that shows all
>> of your posts in this thread where you've provided a link. I did that of
>> course to indicate that you were lying about providing two links.
>>
>> But most searches are performed on my own computer. It's easier that way.
> The fact that I'm _not_ lying leads us directly back to you being the
> liar.
Really? If I were you and were being called a liar, I'd move heaven and
earth to find the post to prove to the world what I'd said.
The fact that you can't be bothered doing the simple google search I've
suggested above tells me all I need to know.
>>> I can't be bothered to go back over a thousand odd postings to find the
>>> relevant one. You gave me the impression that you are a yank living in
>>> Singapore - live with it!
>> I'm not responsible for your impressions, Greg. You asserted that I was
>> a yank, based on nothing I've ever said. You're responsible for your own
>> posts, are you not?
> I'm certainly responsible for my own mistaken assumption - however I
> asked and you responded - you take responsibility from the moment you
> responded.
I never said I was a yank living in Singapore, Greg. You did.
--
Craig http://www.wazu.jp/
1,239 Unicode fonts for 82 written language groups:
Price your own web plan: http://www.wazu.jp/hosting/ |