Craig Welch wrote:
>
> Greg Procter wrote:
> > Craig Welch wrote:
> >> Greg Procter wrote:
> >>> "Mr. Travel" wrote:
> >>>> Greg Procter wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> "Mr. Travel" wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Greg Procter wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The bit about green card holders is near enough irrelevant to the
> >>>>>>> majority and the general situation.
> >>>>>>> It closes a tiny loop-hole for US citizens.
> >>>>>> It's in the same sentence of the regulation.
> >>>>> So? The bit about green card holders is near enough irrelevant to the
> >>>>> majority and the general situation.
> >>>>> It closes a tiny loop-hole for US citizens.
> >>>> How does this close a loop-hole for citizens, since it (green card
> >>>> status) doesn't apply to them.
> >>> A US citizen could use a "green card holder" to circumvent the act if
> >>> the act did not include such people.
> >> And does it include such people?
> >
> > You claim it does.
>
> But you never believe anything I write, so I'm asking you again, does it
> include such people?
Irrelevant. |