Greg Procter wrote:
> Mr Travel wrote:
>
>>Greg Procter wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Sure, but we were discussing the US Act and it's effect on US citizens
>>>in regards to purchases from Cuba.
>>>
>>
>>We were. Then, you indicated the inclusion of permenent residents was a
>>loophole to prevent US citizens from sending non-citizens to purchase
>>items in Cuba for them.
>
>
>
> No, you asked for my opinion as to why permanent residents outside the
> US might be included.
>
>
>>Since you mention this was the reason for the "loophole", then it makes
>>sense for me to mention that the US citizen can't possess the restricted
>>products, even if purchased by somone else.
>>
>>Your "loophole" comment, opened this up to beyond the scope of
>>purchasing, as the law also restricts ownership. So, if only citizens
>>were mentioned, the law would have already covered a US citizen sending
>>a non citizen to buy the products for him. Since the law already covered
>>this, it is logical there was not such a "loophole" as described by you.
>
>
> _I_ only mentioned US citizens.
> You asked my opinion as to why others might also be covered by this US
> restriction.
No, you stated it was added as a loophole. |