"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
news:6p2nu3t51e1rdnuo9segk2nirl2g96of1k@4ax.com...
> Benjamin Dover writes:
>
>> Is a radio
>> reciever a transmitter? How about a blood pressure monitor? If they are
>> not, why do they have to have a label stating they are in compliance with
>> part 15 of the FCC rules and regulation? The FCC couldn't care less if
>> there was no RF being generated by these devices.
>
> RF and being a radio transmitter are two different things.
Not from the standpoint of potential interference with
other devices. The ONLY thing that matter in that case
is the frequency and field strength; the device being
interfered with could not possibly care less if the "radio
signal" in question was intentional, and/or carried
information.
How many RFI qualifications have YOU done?
Bob M.
|