"Chilly8, aka net Kook Charles Newman" wrote in
news:g02ea3$ffm$1@aioe.org:
>
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>
> "Anonymous Sender" wrote in message
> news:1b576c78654cdd873735d0ea07ee113e@remailer.metacolo.com...
>> "Chilly8, aka net Kook Charles Newman" wrote in
>> news:g029qr$ud6$1@aioe.org:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> It's called "theft of service(s)", you moron. A concept way beyond
>>>> the fecal matter which passes for your brain.
>>>
>>> It is NOT "theft of service" to listen to Internet radio from work,
>>> REGARDLESS of what company policy may say. While they
>>> CAN *FIRE* you, then CANNOT charge you with ANY
>>> *CRMINAL* act. You are NOT committing a crime, by listening
>>> to Internet radio, in violation of workplace policies.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Charlie, you become a bigger and bigger moron with every post you
>> make.
>>
>> Who is paying for the internet connection at work? Unless the
>> employee is paying for it out of his own pocket or the employer
>> permits personal use of the connection, then using it for ANY purpose
>> not directly related to the employers business IS THEFT OF SERVICES.
>> Got that you nitwit.
>
>
> However, you are NOT committing a CRIMINAL act, but listening to
> Internet radio, in violation of company policy. When you CAN be
> FIRED, you CANNOT BE PROSECUTED for ANY criminal
> act, because you are NOT committing ANY crime, by listening to
> Internet radio, in violation of workplace policies.
>
>
>
>
>
Wrong again, moron. Theft of service IS a criminal act. You most likely
will not be prosecuted for it, but you could be. There is at least one
case where someone was and got 3 months. If they had wanted to, they could
have gone after anyone who facilitated breaching a corporate fire wall for
aiding and abetting. |