"Chilly8" wrote in news:g02qv8$ume$1@aioe.org:
>
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
>
> "Anonymous" wrote in message
> news:20080510001418.285B21A73E0@isole...
>> "Chilly8" wrote in news:g02if4$vjl$1@aioe.org:
>>
>>>
>>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>>
>>>
>>> "Buster Hymen" wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9A9993D71515FPopGoesTheWeasel@207.115.17.102...
>>>> "Chilly8, aka net Kook Charles Newman" wrote
>>>> in news:g02ea3$ffm$1@aioe.org:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> X-No-Archive: Yes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Anonymous Sender" wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>> news:1b576c78654cdd873735d0ea07ee113e@remailer.metacolo.com...
>>>>>> "Chilly8, aka net Kook Charles Newman"
>>>>>> wrote in news:g029qr$ud6$1@aioe.org:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's called "theft of service(s)", you moron. A concept way
>>>>>>>> beyond the fecal matter which passes for your brain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It is NOT "theft of service" to listen to Internet radio from
>>>>>>> work, REGARDLESS of what company policy may say. While they
>>>>>>> CAN *FIRE* you, then CANNOT charge you with ANY
>>>>>>> *CRMINAL* act. You are NOT committing a crime, by listening
>>>>>>> to Internet radio, in violation of workplace policies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Charlie, you become a bigger and bigger moron with every post you
>>>>>> make.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who is paying for the internet connection at work? Unless the
>>>>>> employee is paying for it out of his own pocket or the employer
>>>>>> permits personal use of the connection, then using it for ANY
>>>>>> purpose not directly related to the employers business IS THEFT
>>>>>> OF SERVICES. Got that you nitwit.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> However, you are NOT committing a CRIMINAL act, but listening to
>>>>> Internet radio, in violation of company policy. When you CAN be
>>>>> FIRED, you CANNOT BE PROSECUTED for ANY criminal
>>>>> act, because you are NOT committing ANY crime, by listening to
>>>>> Internet radio, in violation of workplace policies.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wrong again, moron. Theft of service IS a criminal act. You most
>>>> likely will not be prosecuted for it, but you could be. There is
>>>> at least one case where someone was and got 3 months. If they had
>>>> wanted to, they could
>>>> have gone after anyone who facilitated breaching a corporate fire
>>>> wall for aiding and abetting.
>>>
>>> If they did THAT, they will fill all the jails, and they would not
>>> have room for anyone else. There are literally THOUSANDS of public
>>> "web proxies" opening up all the time. There are all kinds of public
>>> proxies around the place.
>>>
>>> The reason you cannot find MY proxy on my web site, is becuase I do
>>> not advertise it there. I just simply submit it to proxy lists,. and
>>> let people find it
>>> through the proxy lists. This way, I CANNOT BE PROSECUTED, if
>>> someone finds my proxy in any of the lists, and starts using it from
>>> work, since I am not activly advocating, on my web site, using the
>>> proxy to circumvent company firewalls. There are THOUSANDS of these
>>> proxies in the proxy lists. Becuase many of them there are often
>>> unsuspecting users (usually in China) whose machines have been
>>> scanned, there is no way of KNOWING who submitted the proxy
>>> to the list. I use Tor to go to the proxy list submission sites, and
>>> submit my proxy. That way, if they examine the logs, there will
>>> be NOTHING traceable to MY internet address, showing that I
>>> submitted it. The proxies ARE there, you just won't see any
>>> reference to it on the Web site, that's all. The way Tor works, you
>>> enter one "entry proxy", and then you are randomly routed through
>>> several "Onion Network" routers along the Tor Network, so the IP of
>>> the Tor node you enter will not show in any logs. I use one
>>> Tor entry proxy currently being run by somoene on their
>>> cable modem in Canada, but I an randomly routed through
>>> the Onion Router, and my bits will exit the Tor network, en
>>> route to their final destination, through any of of thousands of
>>> machines, in dozens of countries. There is NO way to tell
>>> whether the actual site owner submitted it, or some script
>>> kiddie scanning that range of addresses scanned it and
>>> added it to the lists.
>>>
>>> And remember, Evidence Eliminator defeats ALL computer forensic
>>> examinations. Since we DO travel the world, contrary to popular
>>> opinion, we always scrub the hard disks on any station equipment,
>>> with Evidence Eliminator, using the maximum level of destruction,
>>> beore carrying is through U.S. Customs. This way, any forensic
>>> examination of the hard disks by Customs and Border Proection,
>>> will get NOTHING of my surfing history. Here at ACRN, it is
>>> policy that the hard disks on ALL station equiipment be wiped
>>> with Evidence Eliminator, using the MAXIMUM level of
>>> destruction, before being being submitted to Customs and
>>> Border Protection inspection. If they cannot recover any
>>> evidence off your hard disks, they have no evidence to
>>> present before a jury.
>>>
>>> It would also depend on where the SERVER is, as well. If they are
>>> using one 20 Euro/month service in Germany I once saw an
>>> advertisement for, some time back, then the operators of THAT server
>>> are ONLY subject to GERMAN laws, becuase the SERVER is in GERMANY.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Charles, Charles, Charles.
>>
>> That wasn't very bright. Openly admitting that you posted your
>> proxy's address to proxy servers. You have just confessed to aiding
>> and abetting.
>
> I AM *NOT* "aiding and abetting". Running a public proxy server
> does NOT violate ANY laws. That is why I am do it the way
> I do it. Since I do NOT advertise the proxies on my web site,
> I am NOT violating ANY laws.
>>
>> I've taken the liberty to forward this to contacts at three LEOs.
>>
>> Have a rotten life.
>
> I dont know what an LEO is. But I will simply run a session of
> Evidence Eliminator, and DESTROY any evidence that I made this post,
> which I am going to do right after I send this message.
>
>
>
>
An LEO is a Law Enforcement Organization. How will you destroy all the
copies of the post on all the usenet news servers or the ones the other
poster forwarded to the LEOs?
|