whitely525@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
> On 8 May, 19:52, john_k...@hotmail.com (John Kulp) wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 08 May 2008 14:27:18 -0400, "Steven L."
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>The real reason they didn't return being they would have lost 100,000
>>pounds of fuel. His argument about cargo shifting is bullshit,
>>because cargo shifts can cause a plane to crash and, if he thought
>>that was the cause, he certainly should have done something about it
>>other than just fly on.
>
>
>
> Just think of the delay it would have caused. I bet a passenger vote
> would have been to get on with it.
>
> More focus should be why it fell off and what corrective/preventative
> actions need to be taken.
>
>
>
>
The thing that strikes me as giving most ground for concern is, if the
maintenance is so careless that an inspection panel falls off, what
state is the other 99.9% of the aircraft in?
T.
|
666412. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666416. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666440. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666448. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666459. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666477. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666478. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666488. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666495. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666495. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
666546. Re: AA Plane Loses Panel in Flight, Flies to Paris Anyway
|
|
|