National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]




Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest flight Posted on: Sun, 18 May 2008 04:22:10 +1000

James Robinson wrote
> Rod Speed wrote
>> James Robinson wrote
>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>> mrtravel wrote
>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>> Bob Myers wrote
>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>> Bob Myers wrote
>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>>> James Robinson wrote
>>>>>>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote
>>>>>>>>>>>> James Robinson wrote

>>>>>>>>>> I'm nothing like line of sight from the GSM base
>>>>>>>>>> I use in my house, and it works fine anyway.

>>>>>>>>> Unless your house is farther away than the horizon,
>>>>>>>>> it most certainly is "line of sight" in this sense.

>>>>>>>> Nope. The base is on a hill at the back of town, and I am
>>>>>>>> on the flat below the hill, with the base well over the top
>>>>>>>> of the hill from my house. Its nothing like line of sight.

>>>>>>> Let's put it this way - how, *exactly*, do YOU
>>>>>>> believe that the signals are getting from you to
>>>>>>> your base at the house, in the above scenario?

>>>>>> It clearly aint line of sight.

>>>>>> Same thing happens in spades with big buildings etc in CBDs etc.

>>>>>> Nothing like line of sight in fact.

>>>>> How are these big buidling NOT in the line of sight?

>>>> The handsets clearly arent in the line of sight of
>>>> the base with that big building in the line of sight.

>>> You obviously haven't the slightest clue what you are talking about.

>> We'll see...

>>> As long as your handset is in the line of sight with the antenna without
>>> the building in the way, it is considered a line of sight propagation.

>> Only by pig ignorant fools like you.

>>> The materials in the building simply attenuate the communication somewhat.

>> Have fun explaining the hill situation. It doesnt get to my house thru the hill, stupid.

> Since you are so smart, explain it to us idiots in enough
> detail that you demonstrate your superior knowledge.

No need, it clearly aint line of sight.

> I'm waiting.

Cant even spell wanking.


666622. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666622. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666628. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666629. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666630. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666636. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666638. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666639. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666640. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666640. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666915. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest flight
666936. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666937. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
666941. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
667056. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
667057. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
667058. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
667064. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
667064. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl
667068. Re: CEO charged for refusing to get off cellphone during Southwest fl