On Dec 3, 8:46=A0pm, Brian wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 07:44:04 -0800 (PST), rapierfen...@live.com wrote:
> > You seem to be under the impression that I am arguing with you when
> >all I=92m doing is asking for the supporting info to back your bullshit.
> >I guess you can=92t figure out how to accommodate a simple common
> >request. Since you are someone that claims to be intelligent (a matter
> >of debate) you should be aware that factual informational sources are
> >normally required when making statements or assertions of absolute
> >truth. Rhetorical or colloquial statements are for casual conversation
> >and not for logical discussions concerning hard numbers and facts.
>
> It's only others who must provide evidence. His statements must be
> taken as absolute truth.
Thank you for explaining that, I get it now. How dumb of me to assume
that information handed out as fact should require credible supporting
data. To bad I didn=92t understand this back in college, it would have
saved me a hell of a lot of work, lol.
Ragnar |