National Anthems: Home | Africa | Americas | Asia | Australia&Oceania | Europe | Olympic Anthem |

 
Passports: Home [ Africa ] [ Americas, Australia & Oceania] [ Asia] [ Europe] [ Other documents
Travel:
[Europe] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ Carabben ] [ Air ] [Cruises ]
Forum
Live chat




Subject: Re: life after Windows.... Posted on: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 02:07:57 +0000

'nospam' wrote this:

>In article , aracari
> wrote:
>
>> >> >> >the original mac os was purely gui, with a command line bolted on much
>> >> >> >later.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Probably nonsense.
>> >> >
>> >> >it's not 'probably nonsense.' it's exactly correct.
>> >>
>> >> Well, perhaps you'd like to explain in simple words why you
>> >> believe this.
>> >
>> >because i've been writing software for macs for a long time and i know
>> >the internals inside out.
>>
>> Am I supposed to be impressed?
>
>you asked how i knew. that's how i know.
>
>> >perhaps you'd like to explain why you doubt it.
>>
>> Afaics what you have said so far is that a GUI was created to run
>> programs, but you have not explained how and when those programs
>> were written. My view is that they were written *before* the GUI,
>> because that is the normal sequence of things, otherwise you would
>> have no way of testing the GUI.
>
>the gui and whatever the app does are created together. it might be a
>minimal gui at first, but it's still a gui.
>
>> A GUI without programs to run is pretty useless.
>
>any computer without programs is useless.
>
>> GUI = Graphical User Interface.
>>
>> I do not discount that someone sketched out a GUI *before*
>> writing the programs that it will run to work out what features
>> they wanted in it and its general design etc, but that is not
>> what you have said.
>
>there's just one app and both the interface and the functionality are
>written together. the gui is not a wrapper.
>
>> >> You might start by giving me an example of a program
>> >> which runs under the old Mac op/sys and what you do/did to run it.
>> >
>> >double-click it.
>>
>> "double-click" what?
>
>the icon. it's a graphical interface, remember?

Duh! I don't think we need argue about the system GUI,
that of course must exist for GUI programs to run.

I am referring to the many programs which run under it; I gave
an example earlier. They are usually written before their GUI is,
but again the GUI coding may then be included in the code.

--
socialism is like chronic heart disease ...
you may not know you suffer from it, but it'll kill you in the end.

A socialist:"someone who knows everything but understands nothing"

674630. Re: life after Windows.... 674630
674631. Re: One For rennie ===>> greg morrow caught masturbating on flight 6
674632. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674633. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after 67
674634. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674635. Re: life after Windows.... 674635
674636. Re: life after Windows.... 674636
674637. Re: life after Windows.... 674637
674638. Re: life after Windows.... 674638
674639. Re: life after Windows.... 674639
674640. Re: life after Windows.... 674640
674641. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674642. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674643. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674644. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674645. Re: life after Windows.... 674645
674646. Re: life after Windows.... 674646
674647. Re: [OT] aracari/humminbird is a no nothing newbie Re: life after Win
674648. Re: life after Windows.... 674648
674649. Re: life after Windows.... 674649