On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 18:31:41 -0700, "Seeker"
<4not_listed_due_to_spam_bots_121101@dont.reply> wrote:
>> >> > Yes, they are similar. But Hindus have exceeded everyone in anger. It
>is just amazing (and I am being very honest) to see the level of hatred
>and anger among Hindus.
>> >>
>> >> Historically Indian muslims, from rulers to unpatriotic pampered
>> >> minority, have little to be angry about. However, their hatred of
>> >> Indian/Hindu heritage is obvious to others if not to themelves.
>> >
>> >How can you say this. This view of pampered minority only exists in the
>> >minds of the BJP/VHP followers. This is how BJP/VHP/RSS have polarized
>> >India over something that is non-existent. Muslims don't hate Hindus. I
>have no idea how you came up with such a brazen assumption. Muslims will hate
>the Hindus who take it upon themselves to go around killing innocent Muslims
>> >especially when the hoodlum Hindus go unpunished and in fact are
>protected by the Indian politicos.
>>
>> Isn't it amazing these Paindoos who killed Bengalis Muslims by the
>> millions now like a true chameleon turn around to become their best
>> defenders.
>> Unless the half Sikh settle their claims with Bengali victims, no one
>> would take anything these followers of Ranjeet Singhs Islam say, very
>> seriously.
>
>You can speak for yourself and your 27 ., but you can't speak for more
>than that. I am sure this is too hard for you to understand.
I have never claimed to be a spokes-person for anyone except myself.
Paindoos were taken aback by resounding success of Altaf Hussain and
could never understand why Mohajirs would reject the benevolent hand
of Pimps and whores like the local Paindoos.
>>
>> >> Hindu are angry, and have a lot to be angry about. Their problem is to
>> >> not fight a battle when and against it should have been fought (for
>> >> example, a la Abraham Lincoln on deamnd to partition America) but
>> >> engage in small meaningless acts of anger later.
>> >
>> >Abraham Liconln's fight does not apply to India.
>>
>> But Ranjeet Singhs fight does.
>
>How readily he shouts his great forefathers name at every opportunity he
>gets. Nusrat is the most loyal and devout son of Ranjeet Singh.
Someday when you remove your Burqua, we will all see who is the carbon
copy of that great man.
>> >>
>> >> > > You'd notice that muslim's have been in no rush to get rid of
>castes Pt. Nehru would disagree with you.
>> >>
>> >> Disagreement from Nehru is an honor for any patriotic intelligent
>> >> Indian. He was a theoretical person. Also not above using his brahmin
>> >> caste "pundit nehru" when it suited him.
>> >
>> >I am just amazed to see how seemingly intelligent Hindus will
>submissively parrot the views forced on them by the likes of VHP/BJP/RSS etc.
>>
>> So there are some intelligent Hindus after all, one would never know
>> by reading your childish nonsense.
>
>Most Hindus are very smart. Kiran is eloquent and makes excellent arguments.
>That's why I enjoy discussing issues with her. Too bad you are not a Hindu.
>
>> >> Anyway, the point is not Nehru but whether Indian Muslims have truly
>> >> gotten rid of castes. They have not. Nor have Indian Christians.
>> >
>> >They have not gotten rid of it completely, but the subcontinent Muslims
>are the farthest ahead of both Hindus and Christians. It would be sigh of
>relief
>> >if Hindus were catch up to the level of acceptance of others shown by
>> >Muslims.
>>
>> Starting right from your own high standard of knowledge and wisdom as
>> left behind in your genes by the great Ranjeet, right?
>
>Unfortunately the Maharaja only left his genes in you.
Why not take off your Burqua and let the evidence speak for itself,
this I know the pimp will never do.
|