Go Fig wrote:
>
> > like this. Her vehicle ran into another truck after being struck with an RPG,
> > and
> > her injuries were apparently consistent with that. Moreover, the doctor said
> > that
> > they unzipped her pants and that buttons were in place, which would be
> > inconsistent with a .ual assault.
>
> How much can an unconscious person resist to cause broken buttons, torn
> clothes and defensive wounds ?
I guess that you are suggesting that someone who would be callous enough to .
and sodomize an unconscious women with serious injuries would take the time to
carefully undo all her buttons, remove her clothing and then replace everything and
do up her zipper and button, and that all this would be done at the scene of a
recent battle with a chance of the enemy returning. It makes no sense at all.
> What you have shown in your excellent
> attributions is that no . kit was taken, my only assumption.
Of course no . kit was used, and I gather that you have little or no
understanding of what a . kit is or the reason for it. Since you appear to
prefer to play silly, I will try to explain it to you. First of all it is not some
sort of test to see if someone has been .d. It is a set of medical instruments
and equipment to collect DNA samples. Those would include semen samples, the
victim's hair and pubic hair, finger nails , and all of the victim's clothing. They
are used for the prosecution of rapists. If there had been any indication of a
.ual assault, I am sure that the doctor would have checked it out. But as was
pointed out to you, there was no reason for the doctor to have carried out any suck
collections because there had not been any reason to suspect a .. Even if he
did, it was a war zone, and chances of a . trial would in those conditions are
slim.
I have to wonder what sort of . kit the US army used when they examine Lynch 9
days later. Maybe you can do some research and see what use a . kit would be
after that period of time and after she had been exposed to so many different
people.
> I leave this subject with this; try and see the ABC interview, all
> parties speak in english except the singing nurse. These interviews
> were as a result of a specific paragraph in PFC Lynch's own book
> concerning .. There is a unnatural hesitation in her voice when
> specifically asked about it; she, of course, has access to her official
> U.S. medical report.
In an interview, she denied that she had been .d. So I guess we are facing a
claim that there was a . based on medical reports from examinations at least 9
days after the alleged assault. I have to wonder how the author got access to
Lynch's army medical records. Maybe the huge sum paid for the book have something
to do with the story being spiced up a bit.
>
> > If she had done what they had originally done when the reports first came out
> > she
> > would be something of a hero.
>
> This report (s) is 1 report, and it was that article that was picked up
> world wide. It names only some "official." This aspect was covered on
> ABC TV this week, during the first ever interview with Lynch. There was
> never an official release from the U.S. Military that touted her heroic
> fighting.
It's interesting how the army brass is backing off on the stuff that was fed to the
media. Bear in mind that she was awarded a Bronze Star, and award that is supposed
to be awarded "For heroic or meritorious achievement of service, not involving
aerial flight in connection with operations against an opposing armed force." I am
having trouble figuring out where being hurt in an attack, passing out and then
waking up hours later in a hospital fits into that one.
> > As it turned out, she did no such thing. She
> > did
> > not fire until she ran out of ammunition.
>
> She never fired a single shot, she stood her assigned station bravely as
> her sergeant indicated on ABC TV.
Her sergeant? Where was he? The news reports indicated that everyone else in the
unit had been killed. She never stood anywhere. She was out cold and carried off on
a stretcher.
>
> > up with abuse in the hospital. It turned out that she was well treated by the
> > medical staff.
>
> Has there been ANY other reports to the contrary ?
Yes. I cited them earlier, even cut and pasted the quote to make it exceptionally
easy for you. You managed to miss it. The lawyer who made the claims about his
witnessing her abuse made a lot of money on the deal.
>
>
> PFC Lynch's only reservation/resentment is that her rescue was filmed.
> That was indeed marketed, but it was quite a unique success.
Well jeepers. Doesn't that tell you something right there. They go in on a special
mission to "rescue" a POW (read "patient") and send a crew along to videotape the
adventure.
I am beginning to realize how right P T Barnum was. There is one born every minute.
|