Dave Baker wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:45:07 +0800, "....lobert...." wrote:
>
>> Dave Baker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:27:17 +0800, "....lobert...." wrote:
>
>>>>>> The law was amended in accordance to the constitution, so what is wrong
>>>>>> with the amendment even if it was amended on the same day?
>
>>>>> Where is the separation of power? A law is changed & the leader benefits to
>>>>> the tune of millions of dollars 2 days later? You know the old saying - if it
>>>>> looks like shit & smells like shit....
>>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that the constitution, the election and the people who
>>>> stand for election and the people who went to vote in the election are
>>>> all shit? Now one shit is trying to throw shit at another shit in Thailand?
>>> The election was BEFORE this incident. Get your timeline straight.
>>>
>> Did I said the election is after this case.
>
> In that case what has the election got to do with the case we are talking
> about? Do you always fly off at tangents?
>
>> What is wrong to amend the
>> law if you are in the government with majority.
>
> Everything, if it is to benefit you - it goes against the whole ideals of
> democracy. I suppose if Thaksin brought in a law naming himself
> Dictator-For-Life that would be fine by you as well?
>
Did he do that (Dictator-For-Life)? No, he dissolve the parliament and
call for new election. Let the people decide.
>> The opposition accused
>> him mixing his business with politic and government, The fastest way to
>> get rid of his business is to sell away his business. The law has to be
>> amended to allow him to get rid of his business.
>
> Please - what was done was illegal - his son took the fall for him. We have
> already established that. The law was NOT changed to allow him to get rid of
> his business - the law was changed to allow him to get rid of his business
> without paying tax.
>
Whether his son or his maid took the fall for him, so long as the court
did not convict him, what is wrong with that. You don't pay tax for
capital gain anyway.
> Seems that you are unable to think rationally - if Thaksin brought in a law
> saying all people named lobert should be lined up & shot, would that be ok by
> you? After all, he is in the majority!
>
He only terminated the drug pest and terrorists. Did he arrested anyone
from the opposition ? No! |