On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:48:19 GMT, flavia18@verizon.net aka Suzy Cohen
the th*ck Irish cunt wrote:
>
>On 30-Aug-2006, Pumba wrote:
>
>> ur_droll wrote:
>> > flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>> >> On 29-Aug-2006, "Ed" wrote:
>> >>> "Keith E." wrote in message
>> >>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 11:42:40 GMT, flaviaR@verizon.net wrote:
>> >>>>> On 28-Aug-2006, "Ed" wrote:
>> >>>>>> wrote in message
>> >>>>>>> More like, none, because no records show that he had any Jewish
>> >>>>>>> antecedents.
>> >>>>>>> Susan
>> >>>>>> I was going by the "rumor" that one of his great-great parents was
>> >>>>>> Jewish.
>> >>>>> Ah, okay.
>> >>>> Okay? O.INGKAY?!? He doesn't have to prove his statements?
>> >>> Hey, genius, I said it was a RUMOR. Do I need to prove rumors?
>> >> And to clarfiy for Mr. Hissy Fit - when you admit something is a rumor,
>> >> you are already saying that you can;t vreify it and you don't expect
>> >> your statement to have the same consideration a proven fact has.
>> > much like the rumor that during the times of the rumored holocaust a
>> > prisoner spot check revealed that a jew was found to have balls......
>
>Isn;t (sic) it nice when they admit, right up front, that they have no actual
>refutation, just projectionary filth?
Isn't it nice when all that wannabe jews have is lies and innuendo?
>> > These sorts of fictitious claims are obviously hogwash and simply don't
>> > warrant a serious effort to attempt verification.....
>
>Translation: facts bother bigots.
Re-translation: Suzy is fact-resistant.
>> > quite obviously
>> > the balls in question belonged to a german soldier and were found in
>> > the jews mouth.
>>
>> ooh, Colin, you're trying waaaaay too hard to offend.
>
>But you see what I mean about projectionism?
>It's all too obvious where he fantasizes the balls were:
>
>http://www.brucemulkey.com/archives/2006/05/antigay_zeal_gr.html
Now what does quack mulkey say about anti-paedo zeal, you th*ck Irish
cunt?
>> you need to dial it back a bit if you really want to get people riled up.
>>
>> you should know - a small prick is often all that is needed.
>>
>Or, rather, will have to do when it's all he has.
A .ual slur? Well, there's something new.
>Suzy
|