pluto wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:12:33 -0800, nobody@spamcop.net in this message
> <1173039156.664390.312320@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
> <22HGh.5181$wS3.2900@newsfe12.lga> <11170$45eb75a6$cef8be94$2196@TEKSAVVY.COM>
> from <0sv5v257dqq8b8giblap47v9nq7aqd7i4m@4ax.com> subject as: Re: Boeing
> develops Anti Hijack pilot system:
> wrote/and/or quoted:
>
>
>
>
>>On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 20:43:03 -0500, "Mike" wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Richard" wrote in message
>>>news:22HGh.5181$wS3.2900@newsfe12.lga...
>>>
>>>>That sound just great. Now they won't even have to hijack a plane. You
>>>>just have to hijack the ground station that is controlling the plane and
>>>>then fly it where ever you want.
>>>
>>>No you have to do both actually, and im pretty sure you would probably
>>>require a army to hijack the ground station, it'll probably be just as
>>>secure as a nuclear missle.
>
>
> yea yea yea
> and the hijacker/s goes/go loco blowing the whole plane up?
>
I think the Anti Hijack system is nuts. I think the issue is not as much
about terrorists blowing up the plane, but crashing them into something.
There are other ways to kill a couple of hundred people that don't
require airport/airliner security. |