On Sep 7, 7:20 pm, brucedpa...@... wrote:
> Fine, I believe that you took a picture of Steve Kramer in the police
> station, however a photo of an individual in a police station is
> hardly proof that said individual was under arrest.
>
> I have been in a number of police stations, to pay traffic fines, to
> report stolen goods, etc. At no time was there any indication that I
> was "under arrest" simply because I was physically in a police
> station.
>
> I certainly have no intent to defend, or defame, Steve Kramer but your
> statement that he was under arrest would certainly sound more factual
> if it was supported with some sort of evidence such as copies of the
> police station log showing the record of the arrest, name of the
> arresting officer, documents showing discharge of the arrest, court
> action, or something similar.
>
> Bruce in Bangkok
*****While that is fair comment Bruce it would also be fair to ask
Kramer to "prove" his story about his dealings with Charles Bronson
would'nt it?
Anyone can write a story about a dead person who has no right of
reply.
Kramer has indicated on many occasions that that story was true but
like many of his other wild claims had NEVER offered to prove them.
The photo is true and he has confessed to that and also to the fact he
was arrested on that occasion, now it's time for him to step up to the
plate and prove the Bronson story.......
Will he do so?????? Of course not, like all his other stories it's a
figment of his imagination.
|