Alfred Molon wrote:
> In article ,
> this@ddress.is.invalid says...
>
> > 2 *what* cents? If 2 Euro cents, then pre-paid calling cards are a
> > wash, i.e. about the same price. If AU$ cents, then they're just a bit
> > more expensive, 2.3 US$ cents. However they are much more versatile,
> > because they work from *any* phone.
>
> At the level of 2 cents/minute calls are so cheap, that they are
> essentially free. Unless you spend hours on the phone it will be hard to
> spend more than a few Euro on phone calls.
Agreed. So you're basically saying that Skype on *free-of-charge*
Internet is about the same "essentially free" price as a pre-paid
calling card, so the OP can choose whichever he likes best.
> > And why did you silently snip the third option?
>
> I have no idea what that thing is, which is why I didn't comment on
> that.
>
> > Because it's too cheap to fit with your agenda?
>
> What agenda?
You seemed to be pushing Skype. Perhaps I 'read' you wrong, but since
you again silently snipped relevant comments, I don't think I do.
[...]
Minor nit: Your attribution line is broken, it mentions the poster's
e-mail address - which, as in my case, often is rather meaningless - but
does not mention the poster's name. |